What Eight Months of AI Implementation Actually Taught Me

Share

cogs on a desktop

When I started implementing our AI-powered CRM system in March 2024, I believed some of the marketing. Not all of it, but enough to think this would be smoother.

Eight months later, I finally trusted the system enough to let it make decisions on its own. Even now, I’ve got a person reviewing what it does.

If you’re a small business owner looking at AI tools and feeling sceptical, you’re right to be. But you also don’t have time to wait for ever.

The AI Disasters I Hear About Every Week

Most business owners who come to me have already tried AI once. It went badly.

The most common story? Website chatbots promising to handle customer service. They saw the marketing, installed a plug-and-play solution, and within a week, it was giving customers wrong information.

I had one client whose chatbot told someone they did commercial roofing when they only do residential. Another had their bot promise next-day delivery on custom work taking two weeks.

When customers started complaining, they ripped it out and decided AI wasn’t ready.

The AI wasn’t the problem. Their approach was.

They treated it like installing a contact form. Set it and forget it. When you want the benefits without putting in the work to teach it about your business, it fails. Every time.

Research from MIT shows 95% of enterprise AI pilots deliver zero measurable return on investment. The divide isn’t about model quality. It’s about the implementation approach.

Why I Don’t Pitch AI Anymore

When burned business owners come to me now, I don’t talk about AI at all.

I start by asking three questions:

  • Where are you wasting time doing the same thing over and over?
  • Where are mistakes costing you money?
  • Where are you losing track of customers because you’re too busy?

Once they identify those pain points, I show them how we fix them. AI is part of the solution, but so is proper setup, training, and ongoing support.

I tell them straight up: “This isn’t plug-and-play, but it’s not your problem to figure out. We’ll build it, train it, and monitor it until it works the way your business needs.”

The difference? We’re not selling AI. We’re selling time back and fewer headaches. The AI is the tool we use to get there.

The Problems Nobody Talks About

The answers to those three questions surprise me constantly.

I always think they’ll say invoicing or appointment scheduling. B’. But a plumber told me his biggest time waster was explaining to customers over the phone what different pipe materials cost and why.

A pet grooming client was losing track of which dogs needed specific shampoos for skin conditions. She’d dig through old notes every time.

A landscaper spent hours every week driving around to properties he’d quoted on because he forgot exactly what he measured or promised.

These aren’t the sexy AI use cases you see in marketing. Nobody writes case studies about automating dog shampoo reminders.

But there’s the value for small businesses. They’re not looking to transform their industry. They want to stop doing the repetitive work that keeps them working evenings and weekends.

Starting with financial tools misses the mark for most of them. Their pain isn’t in accounting. It’s in the daily grind of their trade.

The Real Implementation Timeline

Here’s what happened when I implemented our CRM system.

The first challenge was getting the correct information from the AI and building all the workflows to automate our tasks. I wanted to consolidate tools. We were paying for separate invoicing systems, and I wanted everything in one place.

Getting the workflows to automate invoicing, then having AI risk-score accounts and suspend hosting when needed? Difficult.

There were many moments when it went wrong. I never let it go live without a person in the loop. It took time to watch what it was doing, refine the prompts, and teach it.

I spent eight months before I felt confident enough to let it make decisions. Even now, we review what it does.

Research shows this timeline is standard, not an exception. AI requires 60-90 days of data collection before delivering optimal results. Businesses expecting immediate transformation typically abandon their systems prematurely.

When I talk to potential clients about this timeline, I frame it differently. It’s not eight months of hard work. It’s been eight months since the system has been learning your business while you’re still doing things normally.

Most small business owners appreciate the honesty because they’ve been burned by promises before. The ones wanting instant magic aren’t a good fit anyway.

Our “done for you” model means we do the heavy lifting during that learning period. They’re not stuck figuring it out alone.

I’d rather lose a client who wants miracles than have someone implement it poorly and blame AI when it fails.

Systems First, AI Second

That landscaper who forgot measurements? The solution wasn’t AI at first.

It was a system. A place to store information consistently. The AI came afterwards, making the follow-up unique and personalised.

This is the opposite of how AI is being sold. But it’s the right order.

I realised this when I tried to implement AI for a client who didn’t have a proper customer database. They had spreadsheets everywhere, sticky notes, and some customers only in their email history.

We spent two months getting their data organised before the AI did anything useful.

Now I spot it early in those three questions. If they don’t tell me their current process clearly, there isn’t a process to automate.

I’ve had to backtrack with clients wanting to jump straight to AI chatbots or automated marketing. One guy wanted AI to write personalised emails to his customers, but he didn’t have them segmented or tagged in any meaningful way.

The AI would’ve sent generic messages. I told him, “We need to spend a month categorising your customers first: who’s bought what, who’s likely to buy again, who needs follow-up.”

He wasn’t thrilled about the delay. But once we did it properly, the AI had something intelligent to work with.

The hardest part is managing expectations when everyone’s seeing demos of AI doing magical things in seconds, and I’m saying “Yeah, but first we need to do three weeks of boring setup work.”

Teaching AI to Watch Itself

Even after eight months, I still need to keep an eye on things.

My phone is answered by an AI bot. I gave it a script and spent time on the prompt.

Then I built a workflow that takes the transcript, compares it to the original prompt, makes suggestions on how it can do things better, and essentially teaches itself.

I get an email with the original prompt, how it’s graded itself, what it’s changed, and the drift from the original prompt. I can see how far it’s gone.

At the start, it started adding things and going off topic. A change to the main prompt and a bit more monitoring, and now it’s working. I don’t have to talk to people spam calling me.

This human-in-the-loop approach isn’t a weakness. Successful AI deployments need human oversight as a feature, not an emergency valve.

The businesses that succeed with AI understand this. They use it to handle routine work while ensuring people are available for situations that need judgment.

Why I’d Do It Again

Knowing what I know now about the eight months of training, the workflows that fought back, and teaching AI to monitor itself, would I still do it?

Yes. Without hesitation.

I want to be at the forefront of this technology. I need to do it first, so I can find out the issues, learn and develop best practices before my clients face them.

That’s what they expect. That’s what I expect a true partner to be.

People believe the marketing. I’m not surprised. Big companies are spending heavily on AI promotion. When you see how good it gets, the hype makes sense.

And it’s good. But we’re still at the start. It goes wrong, and you’ve got to keep an eye on it.

The UK’s 35% AI adoption rate among SMEs isn’t surprising when you understand the barriers. It’s not about cost or access. It’s about trust deficits and knowledge gaps.

The solution isn’t waiting for AI to get easier. The solution is working with someone who’s already fought through the implementation challenges and guides you through them.

By the time AI implementation becomes effortless, the competitive advantage will be gone.

What This Means for You

If you’re a small business owner looking at AI tools, here’s what I’ve learnt:

Don’t start with the technology. Start with the problems. Where are you wasting time? Where are mistakes costing you money? Where are you losing track of customers?

Don’t trust plug-and-play promises. AI implementation takes time to learn your business. Plan for months, not days.

Get your basic systems working first. If you don’t have consistent processes and organised data, AI won’t help you. It’ll automate your chaos.

Keep a person in the loop. Even after training, AI needs oversight. Build that into your workflow from the start.

Work with someone who’s done it before. The learning curve is steep. Having a partner who’s made the mistakes saves you months of frustration.

Our subscription model exists because AI implementation isn’t a one-time project. It’s an ongoing partnership. When something goes wrong, you call us. We fix it.

That’s the difference between AI that transforms your business and AI that becomes expensive shelfware.

The technology is ready. The question is whether you’re working with someone who understands the implementation challenges, not the marketing promises.

Written by

Picture of Chris

Chris

Founder of TTOY Digital

Categories

Related Post